Home About Articles
Unspiked Life
steady energy, no plan to follow

Blood sugar

You Do Not Have To Give Anything Up

You Do Not Have To Give Anything Up. Rebuild the meal instead of removing from it.

Every plan you have tried began by taking something away.

No bread. No potatoes. Nothing after seven. No sugar, which lasted eleven days and ended on a Tuesday. Each one arrived with a list of what was now forbidden. Each one worked for a while and then stopped, and you concluded that you were the problem.

You were not the problem. Removal is a poor method, and it fails on a schedule. There is another way to do this. It is the thing every article on this site has in common, which is why it is worth a page of its own.

1. Rebuild rather than remove

Take a meal you already eat and change how it is built, not whether you are allowed it.

A jacket potato is not on a list of banned foods here. It gets boiled instead of baked, cooled overnight and reheated, eaten with the skin on, and eaten after the protein and the vegetables rather than first. Same potato, same dinner, four small changes to how it is put together. Each one is worth a little, and together they add up to a different evening.

None of that requires you to want it less. That is the point, because wanting it less was never on offer.

This is the whole method: sequence, timing, form, and what goes alongside. Four levers, none of which involve a forbidden list.

Every one of them is free, and every one of them works on food you have already bought.

2. Why removal has a deadline in it

Two reasons, and they are both structural rather than personal.

Rules make food interesting. A food you have banned becomes a food you think about on purpose. Then it gets eaten, and because the rule was absolute, breaking it once reads as total failure. There is no partial state, so the rest of the packet does not count either.

Willpower runs down. It is finite, it drains through the day, and it drains faster when you are tired or upset, which is most evenings. Any plan that depends on holding out has an end date built into it from the first hour. You just cannot see the date.

A method with nothing to hold out against has no such date. There is nothing to break, so there is no week three.

This is also why nobody here will ask you to start on a Monday. Nothing is starting. You are changing how one meal is put together.

3. Crowd it out instead

The other half of rebuilding is adding, and it works in a way that is easy to miss.

You do not improve a diet by starving it. You crowd it. Put enough beans, vegetables, olive oil, fish and nuts into a week and there is less room, and less appetite, for the rest. The change happens because you are full of something else, not because you resisted anything.

That sounds soft. It is actually the more reliable mechanism, because it works through fullness, which is physical, rather than through resolve, which is not.

But there is a catch, and it is the one everybody hits. Adding is not swapping. Seven good foods placed on top of an unchanged week changes almost nothing. The beans have to be there instead of something faster, not as well as it.

That is the honest version of crowding out, and it is why the word is crowding rather than adding.

In practice this is less dramatic than it sounds. Half the plate goes to vegetables and a legume, and what was there before takes up the other half instead of all of it. Nobody has been told they cannot have it.

4. What this looks like across the site

Every article here is one of these four levers, and it is worth seeing them together.

Sequence. Protein first, then the vegetables, then the fats, then anything starchy or sweet. The same plate, in a different order, behaves differently. Nothing left the plate, and nothing had to be resisted.

Timing. Dinner an hour earlier. A ten-minute walk within half an hour of eating. Beans at lunch, which make the evening easier. Same food, moved.

Form. Potatoes boiled and cooled. Steel-cut oats instead of instant. Sprouted-grain bread instead of flour bread. Whole fruit instead of juice. The same food, in the version that arrives more slowly.

Alongside. Chia into the yoghurt. Half a tin of chickpeas into what you were already making. Vegetables in front of the starch. A sprinkle of cinnamon on the porridge. Two eggs before the toast rather than instead of it.

Not one of those is a rule about what you may not have.

5. The one place this does not stretch

It would be dishonest to pretend this method has no edges.

Ultra-processed food is built so that the signal to stop arrives late or not at all. It is soft, dense, quick to eat, and carries almost none of the fibre or water that would take up room in your stomach. There is not much sequencing or reheating can do about a food engineered around the absence of a stopping point.

Even there, though, the answer is not a ban. It is a smaller pack, a plate rather than the packet, and something with fibre in it eaten first.

The fibre is doing real work there. It takes up room. Volume in the stomach is a large part of what tells you to stop, and that is exactly the signal such food is built to slip past.

And knowing the mechanism is worth more than another rule. If a food is built to be eaten past the point of stopping, then eating a lot of it says something about the food. It says nothing at all about your character.

6. Why this is the position, not just the tone

This is not a gentler way of saying the same thing.

A method you can run with what is already in your cupboard has no breaking point. It survives a bad Tuesday, a holiday, a fortnight of work being awful, and a Christmas. There is nothing in it to fall off.

That matters more than how good any single change is, because the only changes that count are the ones still happening in March. A perfect plan that ends in week three is worth less than an imperfect one that is still running at the end of the year.

Start with one

Pick one meal you eat most weeks and rebuild it, without removing anything from it.

Put the protein in first. Move it earlier. Add half a tin of something. Change the form of the starch. One of those four, not all of them.

Two weeks, then decide whether to change something else about that same meal. One change at a time is not politeness. Managing five changes at once is its own job on top of your actual job, and that job runs out at around day ten.

Nothing here is on a forbidden list, and nothing is going to be.

If you have read this far having already given up several things you liked, you are allowed to have them back. That is not a relapse. It is the method.


This article is education, not medical advice. Nothing here is an assessment of you or your health. Talk to your doctor before changing anything, especially if you take any medication.

This is general education about food and daily habits, not medical advice. Talk to your own clinician before changing anything, particularly if you take prescribed medication.